Journal

Freedoms versus Security

This article is published in Futuribles journal no.353, juin 2009

We have seen an upsurge in the numbers of – increasingly successful – social networks, an expansion of information processing techniques and increasing use by individuals of electronic means of communication and (particularly commercial) exchange. Are these things leading towards a world of generalized surveillance, in which private life could easily be violated by political authorities in the name of security or by economic forces for commercial ends? André-Yves Portnoff ponders these questions here, drawing on various recent events to show the extent to which the violation of private life is becoming easy today, if not indeed commonplace, with the establishment and use of personal databases. But at the same time he shows that developed societies remain very vigilant and that each time an abuse looms on the horizon, counter-powers emerge and enable protective measures to be taken.
Does the battle against crime (France, the Nordic countries) or terrorism (USA) justify large-scale telephone tapping and Internet surveillance? To what extent can we trade off respect for the constitutional state and freedom against security? To what extent are technological or legislative counter-measures available to preserve private life against commercial or political intrusion? André-Yves Portnoff looks at all these aspects and reminds us, in conclusion, that digital networks also represent an unprecedented instrument of power for citizens, enabling them to join together and promote the values they deem essential. To act in accordance with democratic values, not making concessions but remaining vigilant, remains the best way of preserving long-lasting security and freedom.

#Nouvelles technologies